Best Wasabi Alternative for File Sharing
Wasabi Is Storage. EasySend Is Sharing.
Wasabi prices object storage at $6.99/TB/month with $0/GB egress (verified 2026-06-03) but ships zero public link sharing. EasySend wraps the sharing layer Wasabi never built.
Short answer: EasySend is the best Wasabi alternative when your goal is handing a single file to a human recipient. Wasabi is excellent S3-compatible cloud storage for backups, archives and big-data workloads, but it has no built-in public sharing UI, no hosted download page, no preview, no password protection and no recipient-friendly experience. EasySend ships all of that free at 1GB per upload, plus a free no-auth REST API. Many teams keep both and use them for different jobs.
The Wasabi Pitch and Its Limits
Wasabi launched on a deliberately blunt pricing pitch: $6.99/TB/month flat (verified 2026-06-03), zero charge for egress, zero charge for API requests, S3-compatible API so existing tooling works. That pricing makes Wasabi dramatically cheaper than Amazon S3 (roughly $23/TB storage and $90/TB egress at standard rates) for storage-heavy workloads with predictable read patterns.
The honest fine print:
- Minimum storage duration: objects are billed for 90 days even if deleted earlier. Bulk-deleting last week\'s uploads does not refund storage.
- Free egress ratio: egress is free only up to a 1:1 ratio with stored data per billing month. If you store 1 TB you can egress 1 TB free that month. Egress beyond that is throttled, not billed extra but capped in throughput.
- No public sharing UI: Wasabi exposes pre-signed S3 URLs and bucket policies for sharing, but there is no hosted download page, no built-in password protection, no preview, no QR code and no analytics. You are building the sharing layer yourself.
- Account required: Wasabi needs signup with a credit card, even for trial. There is no anonymous upload flow.
The Egress Math: When Wasabi Wins, When EasySend Wins
For pure storage-heavy workloads, Wasabi wins on cost. Store 5 TB of backups, read 500 GB a month: Wasabi bills $34.95 storage, zero egress, total $34.95. AWS S3 bills roughly $115 storage and $45 egress, total $160. Wasabi is 4.5x cheaper.
For sharing-heavy workloads, the math inverts. Store a 500 MB file, generate 10,000 downloads of it during a launch week: stored data is 0.0005 TB, so the Wasabi free egress allowance for the month is 0.0005 TB, roughly 500 MB. Egress of 5,000 GB (10k downloads x 500 MB) is 10,000x over the free ratio. Wasabi will throttle aggressively. EasySend charges nothing for that workload at any volume.
The crossover rule of thumb: if your monthly egress is at or under your stored data volume, Wasabi is cheaper. If egress is multiples of stored data, EasySend\'s flat free or $1.99/month Premium handles the sharing tier better.
EasySend vs Wasabi: Side by Side
| Feature | EasySend | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | File sharing with humans | Object storage for systems |
| Account required | None | Yes, credit card required |
| Setup time | 0 minutes | 30+ minutes (bucket, IAM, CORS) |
| Hosted download page | Yes, with preview | None, raw URL only |
| Free tier | 1 GB per upload, 3 days | None, 30-day trial then paid |
| Storage cost (verified 2026-06-03) | Free / $1.99/mo Premium | $6.99/TB/month |
| Egress cost | Free | $0/GB up to 1:1 ratio, throttled above |
| Minimum storage duration | None | 90 days billed even if deleted |
| Public link sharing | Built in, password optional | Pre-signed URLs (DIY) |
| Client-side encryption | Free AES-256-GCM | Server-side only (SSE) |
| Developer API | Free, no auth | S3-compatible (signed) |
| Recipient analytics | Yes on Premium | None |
The Storage + Sharing Workflow Most Teams Run
The pattern that wins for teams running both cold archive and warm sharing looks like this:
- Cold tier in Wasabi. Nightly backups, raw video masters, log dumps, ML training datasets and other "store a lot, read rarely" data sit in Wasabi buckets at $6.99/TB/month with the 1:1 free egress ratio.
- Warm tier in EasySend. Files you actually share with people (client deliveries, design proofs, build artifacts, photo bundles) upload to EasySend. The 1GB free cap covers most individual sends.
- Glue with the free EasySend REST API. When a workflow needs to pull a file from Wasabi and ship it to a recipient, a single script downloads from Wasabi, POSTs to EasySend and emails the resulting share URL. The free EasySend REST API needs no API key and no OAuth.
This split lets you keep Wasabi\'s storage economics and EasySend\'s sharing UX. Neither service has to grow into the other\'s territory.
What Wasabi Cannot Do for Sharing
1. No Hosted Download Page
A Wasabi pre-signed URL is a raw HTTPS link to an S3 object. The browser either downloads the file or, depending on Content-Type and Content-Disposition headers, shows it inline. There is no friendly "you have a file from Alice, click here to download, here is the file size and the expiry" UI. EasySend wraps every upload in a hosted download page with preview, expiry information and an optional password gate.
2. No Built-in Password Protection
To password-protect a Wasabi share you either generate a short-expiry signed URL and treat the secrecy of the URL as the password, or you put a separate web app in front of the bucket. EasySend ships free password protection as a single toggle. Pair it with client-side encryption and the file is mathematically private even from EasySend.
3. No Recipient Experience
Wasabi optimizes for the developer or systems engineer pushing data into buckets. The recipient experience is "click an opaque URL, hope the file downloads, no metadata visible." EasySend optimizes for the recipient first. Every share link includes the file name, size, expiry, optional preview and a clean download button.
4. No Free Tier for Tiny Senders
Wasabi has no permanent free tier. A 30-day trial requires a credit card. For an individual who sends one 500MB file a month, Wasabi is technically possible but operationally absurd. EasySend free is genuinely free for that use case, including the encryption layer.
When Wasabi Stays the Right Tool
- Backups and archives. Anything you store now and might read later, especially at TB scale, belongs on Wasabi. EasySend is not designed for cold archival.
- S3-compatible systems integration. If your existing tooling speaks S3 (Veeam, Borg, restic, Synology Cloud Sync, MinIO clients), Wasabi drops in. EasySend speaks its own simpler REST API instead.
- Sustained internal-only workloads. Data lake queries, ML training reads, build cache reads. These run inside your infrastructure and never touch a human recipient, which is exactly where Wasabi shines.
Adjacent Storage and Sharing Options
If you are comparing Wasabi against other object storage vendors with sharing in mind, see the Backblaze B2 alternative page (similar $0/GB storage tier with explicit egress charges) and the Dropbox Transfer alternative for the "managed file sharing with paid quotas" lane. For programmatic uploads, the EasySend developer API reads as a single curl POST that returns a JSON share URL. Full EasySend pricing stays flat at $1.99/month for Premium regardless of team size, with no per-user multiplier and no egress charges at any volume.
Try EasySend FreeFrequently Asked Questions
What is the best Wasabi alternative for file sharing in 2026?
EasySend is the best Wasabi alternative when your goal is sharing files with humans rather than bulk object storage. Wasabi is S3-compatible cloud storage priced at $6.99/TB/month (verified 2026-06-03) with zero egress fees and no API request charges, which makes it excellent for backups and archives. But Wasabi has no built-in public link sharing, no hosted download page, no preview, no password protection and no recipient UI. EasySend gives you all of that for free at 1GB per upload, plus a free no-auth REST API for programmatic shares.
Wasabi egress math: when do the zero egress fees actually save money?
Wasabi charges $6.99/TB/month storage with $0/GB egress, vs Amazon S3 at roughly $23/TB storage and $90/TB egress. For storage-heavy archives that rarely download, Wasabi is dramatically cheaper. But Wasabi enforces a "minimum storage duration" policy where deleted objects are billed for 90 days regardless, and the zero egress only applies if monthly egress is at or below the monthly stored data volume (the 1:1 free egress ratio). Egress beyond stored data is throttled, not free. For pure file sharing where data lives briefly and downloads heavily, Wasabi pricing breaks down. EasySend includes hosting AND egress free up to 1GB per upload.
Does Wasabi have public file sharing links built in?
No. Wasabi is S3-compatible storage, which means you can generate signed URLs programmatically (pre-signed S3 URLs with an expiry) but there is no native "click here to share" UI, no hosted download page, no preview, no password protection and no recipient-friendly experience. To share a Wasabi file with a non-technical recipient you must write code to generate a signed URL, paste that URL into an email or chat and hope the recipient understands what to do with a raw S3 URL. EasySend wraps that whole flow in a free hosted download page.
How does Wasabi storage workflow compare to EasySend sharing workflow?
Wasabi workflow: sign up, add a credit card, create a bucket, configure IAM credentials, install the AWS CLI or s3cmd, upload via S3 API, generate a pre-signed URL with the AWS SDK, send the URL. Setup is 30+ minutes for first-time users and recurring uploads require glue code. EasySend workflow: open easysend.co, drag the file, copy the link. Setup is zero seconds and recurring uploads can use the CLI or the free REST API. The right tool depends on volume. Wasabi for TB-scale archives, EasySend for GB-scale shares.
Should I use Wasabi or EasySend?
Use both, for different jobs. Wasabi excels at cold storage: backups, archives, media masters, log dumps where you store a lot and read rarely. EasySend excels at warm sharing: client deliveries, design reviews, build artifacts, photo sends where you share a small payload widely and want a friendly recipient experience. Many teams use Wasabi as the cold tier and EasySend as the sharing tier, pulling a file from Wasabi when needed and re-uploading to EasySend for the actual share. Glue is the EasySend REST API at /developer-api.
Does Wasabi or EasySend offer end-to-end encryption?
Both offer encryption but with different guarantees. Wasabi provides server-side AES-256 encryption with Wasabi-controlled keys by default and supports customer-managed keys (SSE-C) for enterprise customers. Neither is client-side, so Wasabi staff can technically read your data. EasySend offers optional client-side AES-256-GCM encryption where the key is derived in your browser via PBKDF2 from a passphrase and never reaches our servers. For sensitive files, EasySend client-side encryption is stronger because it removes EasySend from the trust chain entirely.